There is an experience nearly all of us have had and very few can explain: listening to a piece of music — a Beethoven symphony, a Mozart adagio, an unexpected chord in some ordinary song — and feeling something that cannot be put into words. It is not joy, not sadness, not any nameable emotion. It is as if the music touched a layer of our existence that lies beneath language, beneath thought, beneath everything we call “self.” Why does this happen? Why does music move us in a way that painting, poetry, and sculpture — however beautiful — can never quite replicate?
A nineteenth-century German philosopher devoted some of the most extraordinary pages ever written in the history of philosophy to answering this question. His name was Arthur Schopenhauer, and his answer is found in the third book of The World as Will and Representation (1818). This article focuses on that answer — Schopenhauer’s aesthetics, that is, his theory of the arts and, above all, his famous thesis on music. The broader overview of his system — the Will as thing-in-itself, metaphysical pessimism, the veil of Maya, the paths of compassion and asceticism — is treated in a separate article; here I presuppose only the minimum needed and go straight to the problem of art.
Recap: Will and Representation in One Page
To understand Schopenhauer’s aesthetics, three theses of his system are enough to keep in mind.
First: the world is representation. Everything we know — colors, sounds, shapes, things separated in space and time — is the world as it appears to a subject, filtered through the forms of our mind (space, time, causality). This is the domain of the phenomenon, which Schopenhauer, following the Hindu tradition, calls the veil of Maya: a screen of appearances concealing the essence of things.
Second: behind representation lies the Will. The thing-in-itself that Kant had declared unknowable is, for Schopenhauer, accessible from within — through our own body, which we experience not only as an object but as willing. This innermost essence of everything that exists is the Will (Wille): a blind, irrational, purposeless, and restless drive, identical throughout nature, from gravity to human desire.
Third: to will is to suffer. Since the Will is incessant desire, and every desire arises from a lack, to exist is to swing — “like a pendulum” — between the pain of unsatisfied desire and the boredom of desire fulfilled. Suffering is not an accident of existence: it is its very structure.
It is precisely here that art enters. If life is the tyranny of a willing that never rests, is there any state in which the willing falls silent? Schopenhauer answers yes — and that art is the first of these states. Aesthetics, in his system, is no decorative appendix: it is one of the three escapes from suffering.
Platonic Ideas as Grades of Objectification of the Will
Before speaking of the arts, Schopenhauer needs an intermediate step between the Will (one, blind, outside space and time) and the particular objects of the world (many, changeable, individuated). He finds that step in Plato: the Ideas.
Just as Plato distinguished between sensible objects — changeable and imperfect — and the eternal, perfect Ideas, Schopenhauer distinguishes between the particular things of the phenomenal world and the Ideas, which he reinterprets as the grades of objectification of the Will. The Will, in itself, is undivided. But in manifesting itself in the world of representation, it objectifies itself at ascending degrees of complexity: first the inorganic forces (gravity, rigidity, elasticity), then the vegetable forms, then the animal, and finally human consciousness. Each grade is an Idea — an eternal archetype.
The decisive distinction for aesthetics is this: the Ideas are not subject to the principium individuationis (space, time, causality) nor to the principle of sufficient reason that governs scientific knowledge. They therefore cannot be grasped by discursive reason, which always asks “where,” “when,” and “why.” The Ideas yield themselves only to a very particular mode of knowing — and that mode is aesthetic contemplation.
Aesthetic Contemplation and the “Pure Subject of Knowledge”
In ordinary cognition, the intellect serves the Will: we look at things in order to use them, avoid them, possess them. We see water as something that quenches thirst, the tree as shade or firewood, the other person as an obstacle or a means. Everything is considered according to its “what-for.” This is the interested gaze — and it is the source of suffering, because as long as we desire, we lack.
In aesthetic contemplation, something extraordinary happens: the intellect breaks free from the Will. We stop asking what the object is for and begin to contemplate only what it is — the Idea manifested in it.
“When, raised by the power of the mind, we abandon the usual way of considering things (…) and no longer consider the where, the when, the why, and the for-what of things, but solely and exclusively the what; (…) then, at one stroke, the particular thing becomes the Idea of its species, and the perceiving individual becomes the pure subject of knowledge.”
In that instant, two movements occur at once. On the side of the object, the particular thing is transfigured into the Idea — I no longer see this oak tree, but the Idea of the oak. On the side of the subject, the desiring individual dissolves and becomes the pure subject of knowledge (reines Subjekt des Erkennens): a transparent consciousness, without ego, without will, a clear mirror reflecting the world without the distortion of personal interest.
And since suffering is a function of desire, and desire is a function of individuality, at the moment the desiring “I” is extinguished, suffering ceases as well. Aesthetic experience is thus a liberation — though, as we shall see, only a temporary one.
The Hierarchy of the Arts
If aesthetic contemplation is the intuition of the Ideas, and if the Ideas form a scale of grades of objectification of the Will, then the arts themselves can be ranked according to the grade of Idea each one makes visible. With this, Schopenhauer constructs one of the most elegant aesthetic hierarchies in the history of philosophy.
Architecture: the lowest grades
Architecture reveals the most elementary Ideas of nature: gravity, rigidity, cohesion. A Greek temple is the visible struggle between the weight pulling downward and the structure that resists and supports. Architectural beauty arises from this conflict made transparent — the Will objectified in its crudest forces, displayed plainly before the gaze.
Sculpture and painting: the natural and human form
Rising on the scale, sculpture and painting contemplate higher Ideas — vegetable and animal forms and, above all, the human form, which is the highest visible grade of objectification of the Will. A Greek statue of the ideal body does not show this particular body but the Idea of the body — humanity in its plastic essence. Historical painting and the portrait go further, capturing not only form but character.
Poetry, drama, and tragedy: the conflict of the Will
Higher still stands poetry. Lyric poetry expresses the states of the Will; the epic narrates its manifestations in the world; and tragedy — for Schopenhauer, the summit of the poetic art — presents the supreme conflict of the Will with itself. In tragedy, we see human beings torn apart by their own desires, destroyed by willing. It is the art that comes closest to the metaphysical truth of the system: that life is suffering.
“The purpose of this highest form of poetry is the representation of the terrible side of life: the nameless pain, the misery of humanity, the triumph of wickedness, the scornful dominion of chance, and the irremediable fall of the just and the innocent.”
All these arts share something in common: each is a window onto a different grade of reality, but all of them contemplate Ideas. They are, in this sense, copies of copies. And it is here that Schopenhauer takes his most audacious step — because there is one art that does not fit within this hierarchy.
Music as the Exception: A Direct Copy of the Will
We have arrived at the heart of Schopenhauer’s aesthetics. The thesis is so radical that the philosopher himself hesitated to formulate it, aware that it surpasses the limits of what philosophy can demonstrate:
“Music is not, like all the other arts, the copy of the Ideas, but the copy of the Will itself, whose objecthood the Ideas are. This is why the effect of music is so much more powerful and penetrating than that of the other arts: for these speak only of shadows, while music speaks of the essence.”
Read that again. All the other arts — architecture, sculpture, painting, poetry — represent the Ideas, which are objectifications of the Will. They are, therefore, copies of copies. Music leaps over all of this: it does not copy the Ideas, it directly copies the Will itself. It does not stand on a higher rung of the hierarchy — it stands outside it, on a parallel plane.
What this means concretely
Imagine the difference like this: a painting of a storm represents the storm — the Idea of natural forces in conflict. Looking at the painting, you contemplate those forces from a distance. But when a symphony evokes a storm — not by imitating sounds, but through harmonic tension, rhythmic escalation, dissonance resolving into consonance — it does not represent the storm. It makes you feel the same force that generates the storm. Music does not point at the Will from outside; it is the Will made sound.
This is also why onomatopoeic imitation — music that tries to reproduce birdsong or thunder — is, for Schopenhauer, the lowest and least interesting grade of the musical art. When music stoops to imitate phenomena, it betrays its own nature, which is precisely to represent no phenomenon at all.
The Parallel Between Music and the Grades of Nature
Schopenhauer is not content to declare that music is a copy of the Will; he proposes a meticulous parallel between the elements of musical texture and the grades of objectification of the Will in nature.
- The bass fundamental (the low notes, the harmonic pedal) corresponds to the most elementary forces of nature — inorganic mass, gravity, the brute basis of existence. Schopenhauer observes that, just as nothing in nature can arise without inorganic matter as its basis, no harmony can exist without a bass to sustain it.
- The intermediate voices (the harmonic filling between bass and melody) correspond to the vegetable and animal kingdoms — the intermediate grades of objectification, which already have form and movement but not yet reflective consciousness.
- The melody (the leading upper voice) corresponds to conscious human life — the Will at its highest grade, with all its restlessness, its detours, its returns, its resolutions, and its frustrations.
“The melody narrates the story of the Will illuminated by reflection, whose expression in the real world is the series of its acts; but more than that, it narrates its most secret history, paints every agitation, every impulse, every movement of the Will.”
The melody is thus the emotional autobiography of humanity. When it rises, there is aspiration; when it falls, resignation; when it hesitates in a chromatic line, doubt; when it resolves on the tonic, rest — but a rest that lasts only briefly, because soon the melody sets off again, starts over, seeks something it never definitively finds. In this, the structure of melody mirrors the structure of willing itself: the desire, the fleeting satisfaction, the new desire.
From this follows the philosopher’s most radical claim: if music is a direct copy of the Will — and the Will is the essence of the world, prior to the phenomenal world — then music does not depend on the world of appearances. It is parallel to the world, not derived from it. Schopenhauer goes so far as to say that music “could, in a certain sense, still exist even if the world did not — which cannot be said of any other art.” And he adds that, if it could be entirely translated into concepts, music would be a universal philosophy.
Why Music Moves Us So Profoundly
Now we can answer the question with which we opened this article. Music expresses not this or that particular emotion, but emotion in its essence:
“Music does not express this or that particular and definite joy, this or that sorrow, pain, horror, delight, merriment, or peace of mind, but joy, sorrow, pain, horror, delight, merriment, peace of mind themselves, to a certain extent in the abstract, their essential nature, without any accessories, and therefore also without their motives.”
This is why a single piece can profoundly move people from entirely different cultures, who share neither history, language, nor experience: music speaks beneath representation, at a level where we are all the same Will. And it is also why we fail when we try to describe the experience of music in words. We say “it’s sad,” “it’s majestic,” but we know these words do not capture what we feel — because language belongs to the world of representation, and music belongs to the world of the Will. They are different registers of reality.
When you hear the Adagio from Mozart’s Clarinet Concerto and feel that tightness in your chest that is neither sadness nor happiness, what is happening, according to Schopenhauer, is that the Will — the same force that moves the stars, makes trees grow, and pulses in your blood — is recognizing itself, through sound.
Aesthetic Liberation as Temporary Relief
We must not, however, overstate the promise. Aesthetic contemplation — and even music, at the summit of all the arts — offers what Schopenhauer calls temporary liberation from the tyranny of the Will. While the contemplation lasts, the desiring subject falls silent and suffering ceases. But the relief has an expiration date.
The music ends. The sculpture is left behind. The sunset passes. And the subject falls back into individuation, into desires, into the Will. Art is, in the philosopher’s own terms, a passing quietive — not the definitive cure. That is why it is only the first of the three paths of liberation his system offers; the other two, compassion and asceticism, seek a more lasting silencing of the willing (and are treated in the separate overview of his system).
Yet it is precisely this transience that gives aesthetic experience its existential value: for a few minutes, inside a symphony, we cease to be individuals starved with willing and become a pure eye, ownerless, contemplating the essence of the world. It is the closest most of us will ever come to the peace Schopenhauer reserves for the ascetic.
The Influence on Musical Aesthetics
Few philosophical theses have had so direct an impact on artistic practice as Schopenhauer’s doctrine of music.
Wagner and Tristan and Isolde
Richard Wagner discovered Schopenhauer in 1854 and described the reading as a revelation. The idea that music is the direct expression of the Will — and therefore superior to all other arts — reoriented his entire aesthetics: music ceased to be the illustration of a libretto and became the very metaphysical substance of the drama. In Tristan and Isolde (premiered in 1865), Wagner attempted to compose what Schopenhauer had described — a music that was infinite desire, a passion that is never satisfied, the dissolution of the self in primordial unity. The famous “Tristan chord,” which endlessly defers its resolution, is the almost perfect sonic translation of Schopenhauer’s thesis: a willing that never finds rest.
The young Nietzsche and The Birth of Tragedy
The young Friedrich Nietzsche was a passionate Schopenhauerian. His first book, The Birth of Tragedy (1872), is deeply marked by Schopenhauer and Wagner. The distinction between the Apollonian (form, individuation, representation) and the Dionysian (intoxication, dissolution of the self, the Will) is a creative reworking of Schopenhauer’s categories, and music appears there as the Dionysian art par excellence — the one that plunges us into the current of the Will. Later, Nietzsche would break with the master, rejecting the pessimism and the negation of the Will; but the ferocity of the break is the measure of the depth of the debt.
Susanne Langer and Adorno
In the twentieth century, Schopenhauer’s intuition reverberated through the philosophy of music. Susanne Langer, in Philosophy in a New Key (1942), developed the idea that music is a presentational symbol — a form that directly expresses the dynamic patterns of affective life, without the mediation of concepts. Theodor Adorno, though working out of Marxism, engaged critically with the Schopenhauerian legacy in his analyses of the music of Mahler and Schoenberg. The question Schopenhauer formulated — that music accesses a dimension of experience inaccessible to language — continues to be debated, and continues to ring true for anyone who has ever lost themselves inside a symphony.
Conclusion: Music as the Mirror of the World
Schopenhauer’s aesthetics culminates in a powerful image: music is the mirror of the world — not of the world of appearances, which the other arts reflect indirectly through the Ideas, but of the world as it really is from within: pure Will, pure motion. While architecture shows us the Will petrified in stone and tragedy shows us the Will tearing itself apart, music gives us the Will without any intermediary, made sound.
Hence the paradox that makes this aesthetics unforgettable: in a system where everything we know is representation — veil, appearance, shadow — there is a single phenomenon that pierces the veil and gives us direct access to the essence. That phenomenon is not the concept, not science, not metaphysics. It is a melody. And perhaps this is why, in a world increasingly noisy with representations, music remains, for so many, the last silent refuge: not because it distracts us from reality, but because it is the most intimate reality we know.
“The effect of music is so very much more powerful and penetrating than is that of the other arts, for these others speak only of the shadow, but music of the essence.”
— Arthur Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation, Vol. I, Book III, §52
Recommended books:
Uma história da filosofia - Vol. III - do Iluminismo francês a Nietzsche
Ver na Amazon →
O mundo como vontade e como representação - Tomo I - 2ª edição
Ver na Amazon →
Textos essenciais de Schopenhauer
Ver na Amazon →
Sobre como lidar consigo mesmo
Ver na Amazon →
Aforismos para a Sabedoria de Vida
Ver na Amazon →
A Arte de ter Razão - Schopenhauer: 38 Estratégias para Vencer Qualquer Debate
Ver na Amazon →
← Articles